linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kexec based hibernation: a prototype of kexec multi-stage load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080516133658.GE6926@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 May 2008 09:36:58 -0400
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec based hibernation: a prototype of kexec
	multi-stage load

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:52:48PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 19:55 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> writes:
> > 
> > > The disadvantage of this solution is that kernel B must know it is
> > > original kernel (A) or kexeced kernel (B). Different code should be used
> > > by kernel A and kernel B. And after jump from A to B, jump from B to A,
> > > when jump from A to B again, kernel A must use different code from the
> > > first time.
> > 
> > I don't know what the case is for keeping two kernels in memory and switching
> > between them.
> 
> This can be used to save the memory image of kernel B and accelerate the
> hibernation. The real boot of kernel B is only needed first time.
> 
> > I suspect a small piece of trampoline code between the two kernels could
> > handle the case. (i.e. purgatory pays attention).
> > 
> > That is a fundamental aspect of the design.  A general purpose infrastructure
> > with trampoline code to adapt it to whatever situation comes up.
> 
> It is possible to use purgatory to deal with this problem.
> 
> Jump from kernel A to kernel B
>     Jump to entry of purgatory (purgatory_entry)
>     purgatory save the return address (kexec_jump_back_entry_A)
>     Purgatory set kexec_jump_back_entry for kernel B to a code
>         segment in purgatory, say kexec_jump_back_entry_A_for_B
>     Purgatory jump to entry point of kernel B
> Jump from kernel B to kernel A
>     Jump to purgatory (kexec_jump_back_entry_A_for_B)
>     Purgatory save the return address (kexec_jump_back_entry_B)
>     Purgatory return to kernel A (kexec_jump_back_entry_A)
> Jump from kernel A to kernel B again
>     Jump to entry of purgatory (purgatory_entry)
>     Purgatory save the return address (kexec_jump_back_entry_A)
>     Purgatory jump to kexec_jump_back_entry_B
> 
> The disadvantage of this solution is that some information is saved in
> purgatory (kexec_jump_back_entry_A, kexec_jump_back_entry_B). So,
> purgatory must be saved too when save the memory image of kernel A or
> kernel B. Purgatory can be seen as a part of kernel B. But it is a
> little tricky to think it as a part of kernel A too.

That's a good point. Remembering the actual return points in purgatory
will require purgatory to be saved along with core file.

I think, purgatory is a good infrastructure for transitions between the
kernels but at the same time, here it is a matter of just making a "call"
and then inspecting the stack in kexec_jump_back_entry. IMHO, we can keep it
simple and not involving purgatory in later transitions.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/