[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h3aoie0ib.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 17:23:24 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>,
Roberto Oppedisano <roberto.oppedisano@...racom.it>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Non-working snd-pcsp
At Fri, 16 May 2008 17:18:36 +0200 (CEST),
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 2008-05-16 15:40, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>
> >> If it does not even beep when issuing Ctrl-G on the shell,
> >> you probably need to modprobe pcspkr, if it is not built-in.
> >> (At least this is with kernels a little less
> >> recent than 2.6.25. )
> >
> >If snd-pcsp module is built, input pcspkr module won't be built...
>
> Previously, with Stas's standalone patch, one was able to switch
> between (a) no speaker (b) beep/pcspkr (c) beep/pcspkr and
> PCM/snd-pcsp, all by means of modprobe/rmmod.
>
> Now, if pcspkr is deactivated when snd-pcsp is built... I would
> not get any tone out of that piece of hardware.
> Except if snd-pcsp itself contains beep code, and that would
> be sort of redundant when it is already in pcspkr.
Indeed snd-pcsp contains the input pcspkr code. Yes, it's redundant,
but separating them isn't trivial.
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists