linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080516124446B.tomof@acm.org>
Date:	Fri, 16 May 2008 12:44:53 +0900
From:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	andi@...stfloor.org
Cc:	fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, muli@...ibm.com, alexisb@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops

On Thu, 15 May 2008 12:48:04 +0200
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:

> 
> > I thought that KVM people want to do it per device (in the first
> > case). So with my patchse, they can replace the dma_ops pointer in
> > dev_archdata with what they want.
> 
> But where would they save the original pointer?

Yeah, we need an extra mechanism for that but it's same for the
system-wide dma_ops pointer (i.e. without my patches), isn't it?

I'm still not sure how this patchset make it impossible to have stack
dma_ops. These people need per-device dma_ops and we can do stack
per-device dma_ops?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/