[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805161214160.3533@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 12:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>, mpm@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [patch 21/21] slab defrag: Obsolete SLAB
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > No doubt you prefer to run a test which fails to show a problem with
> > your code. How about you try running a test which does show a problem?
>
> This is rather interesting. Since Christoph refuses to, here's my
> results with 8f40f67, first with slab:
I sure wish you would follow the discussions instead of having paranoid
thoughts about me not running tests that show regressions. See my
extensive test suite that shows the worst cases in my vm git tree.
> I think I'm going to try backing out some of the recent patches that
> have gone into /slab/ and see if it's been regressing.
Hmmm... Interesting. Could you post the output of slabinfo -AD?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists