[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f7201c8b790$9c2a2340$f9b5a8c0@pii350>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 22:08:29 +0200
From: "Gilles Espinasse" <g.esp@...e.fr>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Lennart Sorensen" <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>
Cc: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>; "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>;
"Rick Jones" <rick.jones2@...com>; "Brandeburg, Jesse"
<jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>; "Chris Peterson" <cpeterso@...terso.com>;
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>; <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of
IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM
> > receives no input. While ethernet might not be preferable if you have
> > something else, sometimes you really don't have anything else.
>
> Ethernet is observable so ethernet isn't entropy. There is no "anything
> else" here -> there is no *anything*
> --
That's funny
It does look to disturb some kernel developper that ethernet may be sniffed
to feed a RNG
even that could be very hard to reach any effective result in the case of a
machine splitting
different network segments.
In the same time, it does not disturb openssl developpers to include non
initialised
memory that may or may not be predictable to feed a RNG.
http://marc.info/?l=openssl-dev&m=121095151003011&w=2
Gilles
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists