[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e4733910805161425i2d6cc034y3377af053a4198b5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 17:25:28 -0400
From: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@...il.com>
To: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net,
fabrizio.garetto@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Describe SPI devices in the OF device tree and add mpc5200-spi driver
On 5/16/08, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com> wrote:
> > On 5/16/08, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
> >> This series is a set of changes to allow the slaves on an SPI bus to be
> >> described in the OF device tree (useful in arch/powerpc) and adds a driver
> >> that uses it (the Freescale MPC5200 SoC's SPI device).
> >
> > Right now we have SPI hooked up to PSC3. Hardware engineer is gone but
> > I'll see if I can get him to alter things to use the SPI controller. I
> > have an old mail from him where he thinks the Phytec board is missing
> > a signal needed to use the SPI controller.
>
>
> While I'd appreciate the testing, I suspect that you really don't want
> to do that. The dedicated SPI controller isn't very good. It only
> does a byte at a time and so is rather slow. A PSC is SPI mode should
> be better (but I haven't tried it personally it yet).
What is the device tree node for PSC3 supposed to look like when it
has both serial and spi enabled?
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists