[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080516213721.GA13492@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 14:37:21 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
len.brown@...el.com, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Suspend/Resume bug in PCI layer wrt quirks
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:16:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 16 of May 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 15, 2008 12:51 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Some quirks should be called with interrupt disabled, we can't directly
> > > call them in .resume_early. Also the patch introduces
> > > pci_fixup_resume_early and pci_fixup_suspend, which matches current
> > > device core callbacks (.suspend/.resume_early).
> > >
> > > TBD: Somebody knows why we need quirk resume should double check if a
> > > quirk should be called in resume or resume_early. I changed some per my
> > > understanding, but can't make sure I fixed all.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
> >
> > I applied this one to linux-next, it should fix some of the problems people
> > have been seeing at least...
>
> Well, that will collide with
> pm-new-suspend-and-hibernation-callbacks-for-pci-bus-type.patch
> in the Greg's tree.
>
> Greg, perhaps it's better if you drop it and I'll send an updated version to
> Jesse? That will make his tree dependent on yours, but that will be okay,
> won't it?
That's up to Jesse. I don't know if he can handle a depancy on an
external tree.
Jesse?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists