[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28c262360805152342r57851584y888c1a4d08820eb2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 15:42:59 +0900
From: "MinChan Kim" <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: "Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lee.schermerhorn@...com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 09/15] add some sanity checks to get_scan_ratio
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 15:34:51 +0900
> "MinChan Kim" <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> @@ -1375,8 +1375,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int priority, struct zon
>> * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio.
>> */
>> if (scan_global_lru(sc) && inactive_anon_low(zone))
>> - shrink_list(NR_ACTIVE_ANON, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone, sc,
>> - priority);
>> + shrink_inactive_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone, sc, priority, 0);
>>
>> throttle_vm_writeout(sc->gfp_mask);
>> return nr_reclaimed;
>
> shrink_active_list, but yes, that is the idea.
But you used argument with NR_ACTIVE_ANON during call shrink_list.
I think It is not your intention.
So, you have to change LRU_ACTIVE_ANON or call shrink_active_list directly.
--
Kinds regards,
MinChan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists