[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080518.000242.41199304.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 00:02:42 +0900 (JST)
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To: macro@...ux-mips.org
Cc: a.zummo@...ertech.it, hvr@....org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RTC: M41T80: Century Bit support
On Sat, 17 May 2008 01:25:18 +0100 (BST), "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org> wrote:
> Make use of the Century Bit to support years in the range from 1970 to
> 2169. Enable toggling of the bit at the end of a century on a clock
> update.
> ---
> The clock is used with the Broadcom SWARM and the D-Link DNS-323
> platform.
>
> I have verified correct operation with the SWARM -- the firmware assumes
> 19YY when CB is clear and 20YY otherwise. Which means years 1900-1969
> will be shown as 2100-2169 in Linux. I think this is a feature rather
> than a problem. The firmware does not set the CEB bit itself and does not
> care of what its state is.
>
> I will be happy to hear from a DNS-323 user to confirm or deny whether
> such an interpretation is compatible.
This patch enforces that all (including future) users of this device
must use same interpretation of CB bit. I think this is too
intrusive.
And I have one (out-of-tree, and only one in the world) board with
this device and its firmware uses different interpretation.
Fortunately I can change this firmware, so this is not a serious
problem for me. ;)
How about doing like this?
1. If CEB was 0, keep current behavior. (does not touch CB bit)
2. If CEB was 1, detect polarity of CB bit on get_datetime, and set or
clear CB bit on set_datetime based on the polarity.
Please look at "c_polarity" variable in rtc-pcf8563.c driver.
---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists