linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] x86: merge nmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18479.21161.437325.251769@harpo.it.uu.se>
Date:	Sat, 17 May 2008 23:48:25 +0200
From:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Cc:	Tom Spink <tspink@...il.com>, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: merge nmi_32-64 to nmi.c

Maciej W. Rozycki writes:
 > On Sat, 17 May 2008, Tom Spink wrote:
 > 
 > > static inline unsigned int get_nmi_count(int cpu)
 > > {
 > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 > >         return cpu_pda(cpu)->__nmi_count;
 > > #else
 > >         return nmi_count(cpu);
 > > #endif
 > > }
 > > 
 > > I know it introduces a lot of these conditionals, but at least there
 > > is one place to look for the get_nmi_count function, instead of
 > > searching for all variants of the function.
 > 
 >  Well, I suppose some header should provide a definition like:
 > 
 > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 > #define cpu_x86_64 1
 > #else
 > #define cpu_x86_64 0
 > #endif
 > 
 > and the you can remove the horrible #ifdef clutter and make the quoted 
 > function look like:
 > 
 > static inline unsigned int get_nmi_count(int cpu)
 > {
 > 	return cpu_x86_64 ? cpu_pda(cpu)->__nmi_count : nmi_count(cpu);
 > }
 > 
 > Much better -- isn't it?

IMO, no, the #ifdef is preferable.

Why? Because the #ifdef is a very visible signal to the platform
people that there are (in this case) subarch differences that force
"clients" to behave differently on different subarchs. By removing
the #ifdef you're IMO making it less likely for the platform people
to take notice and work towards eliminating those differences.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/