[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <482F67C1.2010809@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 01:18:25 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Tracking and crediting bug reporters
On 18-05-08 00:53, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:35:43AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> [Operating in delayed response mode, sorry...]
>>
>> Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> In which format do you want data for commits already in 2.6.26?
>> I hadn't thought about trying to backfill data for existing commits;
>> that sounds like a fair amount of work for coverage which could still be
>> somewhat spotty. If you have the data at hand, though, then a simple
>> file of the form
>>
>> commit-id full-name <email>
>
> How to indicate whether it's a Reported-by or a Bisected-by?
Literal Bisected-by might not make for a very good tag. Bisection is a
way to pin down a bug; just one of them. So say person A reports and
person B says "Hey, I know what that is. Try reverting foo." B then
doesn't fit the tag while the only difference is that B was clever
enough to not need a bisection. So if this is about giving credit;
Tracked-down-by maybe? Something else?
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists