[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200805170943.54031.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 09:43:53 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] lguest: virtio-rng support
Am Samstag, 17. Mai 2008 schrieb Herbert Xu:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 04:28:03PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >
> > But you did not address the DoS question: can we ignore it? Or are we
trading
> > off a DoS in the host against a potential security weakness in the guest?
>
> Why not do both? Use the host's urandom to make the guest at least
> unpredictable on start-up without increasing the guest's entropy,
> and use the host's random to actually increase the guest's entropy.
I think the proper solution would be to use the hosts /dev/hw_rng - if
available.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists