[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080519.011034.25909336.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 01:10:34 +0900 (JST)
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To: macro@...ux-mips.org
Cc: a.zummo@...ertech.it, hvr@....org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RTC: M41T80: Century Bit support
On Sat, 17 May 2008 20:16:20 +0100 (BST), "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org> wrote:
> > How about doing like this?
> >
> > 1. If CEB was 0, keep current behavior. (does not touch CB bit)
> >
> > 2. If CEB was 1, detect polarity of CB bit on get_datetime, and set or
> > clear CB bit on set_datetime based on the polarity.
>
> That's what I did initially as it is as obvious as you can get. But as I
> noted, CFE, the firmware used with the SWARM, does not set CEB even though
> it takes CB into account. The approach is not useful therefore at least
> for one major user of the device.
Oh I had missed that the firmware does not set CEB. Hmm...
> Of course CFE is BSD-licensed and can be changed too, but based on my
> experience with how serious bugs are handled, I would not count on getting
> such a minor change integrated into the official sources.
>
> > Please look at "c_polarity" variable in rtc-pcf8563.c driver.
>
> Hmm, not terribly useful as few of us if anybody live back in the 20th
> century. ;-) I think let's scrap the patch in this case and let our
> grandchildren solve the problem -- a proposal has been published and can
> be reused as needed.
OK for me. Lets hear how our grandchildren complain on this fault. :)
---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists