[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080518014926.917ca9a7.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 01:49:26 -0500
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: ying.huang@...el.com, hpa@...or.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, steiner@....com,
travis@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] x86 boot: add code to add BIOS provided EFI
memory entries to kernel
Ingo wrote:
> so double-checking [the merge of my x86 boot patches] would be nice.
I only see one detail worth mentioning on reading the resulting merge
in ingo.tip.
Shouldn't the static array declarations in arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
be indented? It looks like the -file- static declarations
from arch/x86/kernel/e820_32.c (which were not indented) took
precedence in the merge over the -function- static declarations
from arch/x86/kernel/e820_64.c. The code, from the perspective
of what ends up in the compiled kernel, seems fine -- just the
indentation off.
int __init sanitize_e820_map(struct e820entry *biosmap, int max_nr_map,
int *pnr_map)
{
struct change_member {
struct e820entry *pbios; /* pointer to original bios entry */
unsigned long long addr; /* address for this change point */
};
static struct change_member change_point_list[2*E820_X_MAX] __initdata;
static struct change_member *change_point[2*E820_X_MAX] __initdata;
static struct e820entry *overlap_list[E820_X_MAX] __initdata;
static struct e820entry new_bios[E820_X_MAX] __initdata;
struct change_member *change_tmp;
unsigned long current_type, last_type;
unsigned long long last_addr;
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists