[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <483091E6.9080703@firstfloor.org>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 22:30:30 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [Bug #10710] [BISECTED] Lots of "rescheduling IPIs" in powertop
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> stop these pointless ad hominem attacks!
Just my experience from past incidents sorry. I'm sure it never happened
to you.
>> [In case someone is interested it's CPUID 5 ECX bit 0 which enumerates
>> if the MWAIT enumeration is there. So the correct mwait_usable() that
>> would have avoided your problem would be something like (untested):
>>
>> return c->cpuid_level >= 5 &&
>> ((cpuid_ecx(5) & 1) == 0 || (cpuid_edx(5) >> 4) & 0xf) > 0);
>> ]
>
> I'm interested, but I'd be even more interested in some useful pointer
> to the magic bitnumbers in that check, but don't exert yourself in
> providing the information,
It's documented in the IA32 SDM vol2 as part of the CPUID description.
It's a reasonable expection that everyone hacking on cpuid code has that
at hand.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists