[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87hccvurxr.fsf@saeurebad.de>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 01:13:20 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>
To: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ERR_PTR: warn when ERR_PTR parameter is not errno value
Hi Marcin,
Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com> writes:
> Check at runtime whether error argument of ERR_PTR and ERR_OR_0_PTR
> is valid. It can catch bugs which possibly lead to oops or panic earlier.
>
> Currently there are > 600 calls of ERR_PTR with non-constant argument
> in Linux kernel sources.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
> include/linux/err.h | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/err.h b/include/linux/err.h
> index cdec8b6..51e2459 100644
> --- a/include/linux/err.h
> +++ b/include/linux/err.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
>
> +#include <asm/bug.h>
> #include <asm/errno.h>
>
> /*
> @@ -21,6 +22,7 @@
>
> static inline void *__ERR_PTR(long error)
> {
> + WARN_ON(!IS_ERR_VALUE(error));
> return (void *) error;
> }
>
> @@ -28,6 +30,7 @@ static inline void *__ERR_PTR(long error)
>
> static inline void *__ERR_OR_0_PTR(long error)
> {
> + WARN_ON(!IS_ERR_VALUE(error) && error);
> return (void *) error;
> }
How about WARN_ON_ONCE() instead? That would warn once for each erroneous user
which should be enough.
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists