[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1211185278.2986.8.camel@castor.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 09:21:18 +0100
From: Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: sds@...ho.nsa.gov, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selinux: reorder inode_security_struct to increase
objs/slab on 64bit
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 09:18 +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2008, Richard Kennedy wrote:
>
> > reorder inode_security_struct to remove padding on 64 bit builds
> >
> > size reduced from 72 to 64 bytes increasing objects per slab to 64.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
>
> Thanks, applied to
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/selinux-2.6.git#for-akpm
>
> (Although I see a reduction from 164 to 160 bytes).
>
>
> - James
In that case I think you've got all the lock & mutex debugging turned
on :)
CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES & CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC will add a lot to the
mutex directly.
CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK, CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK &
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC will each grow the spinlock contained in the
mutex.
However, I'm seeing all structures packed to size of 8n -- so I'd never
get a sizeof 164. Maybe that's just a platform/compiler difference ?
I'm running on AMD 64 & gcc 4.1.2
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists