lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48313D8E.7020109@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 May 2008 10:42:54 +0200
From:	Peter Oberparleiter <peter.oberparleiter@...ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	ltp-coverage@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberparleiter@...glemail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] gcov kernel support

This is version #2 of the gcov kernel support patch set (see further
below for an in-depth explanation). Patch base is 2.6.26-rc3.

Changes are mostly based on mailing list feedback:

 * added more documentation
 * moved gcov config menu to general setup
 * renamed some structures and variables (removed _t, lowercase ctors)
 * split mod versioning change into separate patch (3)
 * split GCC_VERSION_LOWER into separate patch (2)
 * split gcov core patch into two patches (5+6) for better readability
 * absolute paths only used when CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE is set
 * fixed compile problem with CONFIG_MODULES=n
 * fixed memory leak in gcov fs code
 * more style changes

Patch overview:

[PATCH 1/7] kernel: call constructors
[PATCH 2/7] kernel: introduce GCC_VERSION_LOWER macro
[PATCH 3/7] kbuild: delay object file renaming during module versioning
[PATCH 4/7] seq_file: add function to write binary data
[PATCH 5/7] gcov: add gcov profiling infrastructure
[PATCH 6/7] kbuild: make source and include paths absolute
[PATCH 7/7] gcov: architecture specific compile flag adjustments

===

This set of patches enables the use of GCC's coverage testing tool
gcov [1] with kernel 2.6.25. Coverage data for the running kernel is
exported via debugfs in a gcov-compatible format. To get coverage
data for a specific file, simply use gcov with the -o option:

# gcov -o /sys/kernel/debug/gcov/tmp/linux-2.6.25/kernel spinlock.c

This will create source code files annotated with execution counts
in the current directory. In addition, graphical gcov front-ends such
as lcov [2] can be used to automate the process of collecting data
for the entire kernel and provide coverage overviews in HTML format.

Possible uses:

* debugging (has this line been executed at all?)
* test improvement (how do I change my test to cover these lines?)
* minimizing kernel configurations (do I need this option if the
  associated code is never executed?)


Known issues:

* some architecture specific problems: the patch has been tested
  successfully on s390 and i386. Known problems exist on x86_64 and
  arm (to be investigated)
* GCC's profiling mechanism together with optimization sometimes
  produces skewed data (see [1])
* GCC's profiling code assumes single-threaded execution
* gcov assumes that a program has finished when coverage data is
  analyzed

Despite these issues, the data which can be obtained has been proven
to be sufficiently accurate for most practical uses.


History:

Hubertus Franke <frankeh@...ibm.com> wrote the first version of this
patch around 2002. Since then it has been adapted to new versions of
the kernel and GCC with contributions by several people (see file
kernel/gcov/fs.c, write me if I missed anyone). Due to regular
requests, I rewrote the gcov-kernel patch from scratch so that it
would (hopefully) be fit for inclusion into the upstream kernel.

--
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html
[2] http://ltp.sourceforge.net/coverage/lcov.php







--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ