linux-kernel - Re: performance "regression" in cfq compared to anticipatory, deadline and noop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 May 2008 12:39:07 +0200
From:	Matthew <jackdachef@...il.com>
To:	"Jens Axboe" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	fchecconi@...il.com, "Daniel J Blueman" <daniel.blueman@...il.com>,
	"Kasper Sandberg" <lkml@...anurb.dk>,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Aaron Carroll" <aaronc@....unsw.edu.au>
Subject: Re: performance "regression" in cfq compared to anticipatory, deadline and noop

Hi,

I just wrote a bug-report as a reminder for this problem:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10746

I hope it's classified in the right subsystem & has enough information
(2 links to this discussion)

Jens, I just looked a little through lkml while searching for the
above mentioned 2 links and found the following post:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/7/319 is it anyhow related to this issue
?

Thanks

Mat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/