[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48319CC2.705@firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 17:29:06 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, corbet@....net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2/11] Add unlocked_fasync
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2008 16:43:05 +0200
> Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
>>> I'd rather do a properly flag day and move lock_kernel into the
>>> instances instead of adding this _unlocked gunk.
>> I've considered that, but it's a bit too many fasync instances
>> all over the tree, so I chose this method.
>
> If I can do all the watchdog drivers in one go then we can do all the
> fasync interfaces in one go. It isn't that hard other than making sure
> people didn't hide them in odd places on platforms not usually built.
If it's that easy for you please audit the ones then I didn't cover yet and send
me a list.
The good news is that none of them I looked at actually needed BKL
(or perhaps I just missed it)
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists