[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4831A09F.8090300@firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 17:45:35 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, corbet@....net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2/11] Add unlocked_fasync
Alan Cox wrote:
>> The good news is that none of them I looked at actually needed BKL
>> (or perhaps I just missed it)
>
> Far better to send an initial patch that simply adds all the lock/unlocks
> then remove them later than worry about it immediately - that makes it
> easier to verify changes and to do testing
I fail to see how that makes it easier than with ->fasync_unlocked.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists