linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/20] tty: Introduce a tty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080519175121.GA25150@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 May 2008 10:51:21 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] tty: Introduce a tty_port common structure

On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 07:47:39PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Alan.
> 
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 03:50:13PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > From: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
> > 
> > Every tty driver has its own concept of a port structure and because they all
> > differ we cannot extract commonality. Begin fixing this by creating a structure
> > drivers can elect to use so that over time we can push fields into this and
> > create commonality and then introduce common methods.
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/char/tty_io.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/tty.h   |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_io.c b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
> > index 49c1a22..fb17b18 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tty_io.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
> > @@ -2004,6 +2004,43 @@ ssize_t redirected_tty_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> >  	return tty_write(file, buf, count, ppos);
> >  }
> >  
> > +void tty_port_init(struct tty_port *port)
> > +{
> > +	memset(port, 0, sizeof(*port));
> > +	init_waitqueue_head(&port->open_wait);
> > +	init_waitqueue_head(&port->close_wait);
> > +	mutex_init(&port->mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tty_port_init);
> A small nitpick...
> The typical style is to let the EXPORT_SYMBOL follow the closing
> brace with no extra empty line.

I'll run them through checkpatch.pl and fix up any minor things like
this before sending them off, that's part of my normal patch-queue
process :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/