[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4831C124.2060905@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 11:04:20 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
CC: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 17 May 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> Thats a lot of work and apparently Mike and Christoph are doing it.
>
> Indeed. Thanks for the support. I hope Mike gets the stuff out soon. I
> know he was working on one issue that cause the zero based stuff to break.
> Maybe it would help if he would post what he has so far?
I'm re-basing it on the x86/latest tree as sched/latest was failing my tests
last week on both the AMD and Intel boxes. As soon as I re-verify everything
I'll send it in.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists