linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 May 2008 11:04:20 -0700
From:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 17 May 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
>> Thats a lot of work and apparently Mike and Christoph are doing it.
> 
> Indeed. Thanks for the support. I hope Mike gets the stuff out soon. I 
> know he was working on one issue that cause the zero based stuff to break. 
> Maybe it would help if he would post what he has so far?

I'm re-basing it on the x86/latest tree as sched/latest was failing my tests
last week on both the AMD and Intel boxes.  As soon as I re-verify everything
I'll send it in.

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/