[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080519184153.GE7773@cvg>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 22:41:53 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
Tom Spink <tspink@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: merge nmi_32-64 to nmi.c
[Cyrill Gorcunov - Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:07:53PM +0400]
| Btw, if someone is still watching this thread - I've found a bit strange
| behaviour of nmi on 32bit platform. Look, we have
|
| nmi_watchdog = NMI_DEFAULT
|
| by default which is the alias to NMI_DISABLED. Then lets assume that
| user put some option on command line, say for example he passes something
| like that
|
| nmi_watchdog=2
|
| which set it to
|
| nmi_watchdog = NMI_LOCAL_APIC
|
| with only that option passed we have sysfs entry created
| but I can't figure out why in proc_nmi_enabled() we have this
| code
|
| if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_DEFAULT) {
| if (lapic_watchdog_ok())
| nmi_watchdog = NMI_LOCAL_APIC;
| else
| nmi_watchdog = NMI_IO_APIC;
| }
|
| it seems it just _dont need_ at and could be safetly removed.
| Did I miss something?
|
| - Cyrill -
Ah, I found... sorry for noise, I'm shutting up ;)
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists