[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080519220024.GX17716@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 01:00:24 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: greg@...ah.com
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6 patch] remove Documentation/usb/uhci.txt
The driver was removed before kernel 2.6.0
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
---
Documentation/usb/uhci.txt | 165 -------------------------------------
1 file changed, 165 deletions(-)
94333efe59af0e1c7fe5c0f36cbbda7899e89d17 diff --git a/Documentation/usb/uhci.txt b/Documentation/usb/uhci.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 2f25952..0000000
--- a/Documentation/usb/uhci.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,165 +0,0 @@
-Specification and Internals for the New UHCI Driver (Whitepaper...)
-
- brought to you by
-
- Georg Acher, acher@...tum.de (executive slave) (base guitar)
- Deti Fliegl, deti@...egl.de (executive slave) (lead voice)
- Thomas Sailer, sailer@....ee.ethz.ch (chief consultant) (cheer leader)
-
- $Id: README.uhci,v 1.1 1999/12/14 14:03:02 fliegl Exp $
-
-This document and the new uhci sources can be found on
- http://hotswap.in.tum.de/usb
-
-1. General issues
-
-1.1 Why a new UHCI driver, we already have one?!?
-
-Correct, but its internal structure got more and more mixed up by the (still
-ongoing) efforts to get isochronous transfers (ISO) to work.
-Since there is an increasing need for reliable ISO-transfers (especially
-for USB-audio needed by TS and for a DAB-USB-Receiver build by GA and DF),
-this state was a bit unsatisfying in our opinion, so we've decided (based
-on knowledge and experiences with the old UHCI driver) to start
-from scratch with a new approach, much simpler but at the same time more
-powerful.
-It is inspired by the way Win98/Win2000 handles USB requests via URBs,
-but it's definitely 100% free of MS-code and doesn't crash while
-unplugging an used ISO-device like Win98 ;-)
-Some code for HW setup and root hub management was taken from the
-original UHCI driver, but heavily modified to fit into the new code.
-The invention of the basic concept, and major coding were completed in two
-days (and nights) on the 16th and 17th of October 1999, now known as the
-great USB-October-Revolution started by GA, DF, and TS ;-)
-
-Since the concept is in no way UHCI dependent, we hope that it will also be
-transferred to the OHCI-driver, so both drivers share a common API.
-
-1.2. Advantages and disadvantages
-
-+ All USB transfer types work now!
-+ Asynchronous operation
-+ Simple, but powerful interface (only two calls for start and cancel)
-+ Easy migration to the new API, simplified by a compatibility API
-+ Simple usage of ISO transfers
-+ Automatic linking of requests
-+ ISO transfers allow variable length for each frame and striping
-+ No CPU dependent and non-portable atomic memory access, no asm()-inlines
-+ Tested on x86 and Alpha
-
-- Rewriting for ISO transfers needed
-
-1.3. Is there some compatibility to the old API?
-
-Yes, but only for control, bulk and interrupt transfers. We've implemented
-some wrapper calls for these transfer types. The usbcore works fine with
-these wrappers. For ISO there's no compatibility, because the old ISO-API
-and its semantics were unnecessary complicated in our opinion.
-
-1.4. What's really working?
-
-As said above, CTRL and BULK already work fine even with the wrappers,
-so legacy code wouldn't notice the change.
-Regarding to Thomas, ISO transfers now run stable with USB audio.
-INT transfers (e.g. mouse driver) work fine, too.
-
-1.5. Are there any bugs?
-
-No ;-)
-Hm...
-Well, of course this implementation needs extensive testing on all available
-hardware, but we believe that any fixes shouldn't harm the overall concept.
-
-1.6. What should be done next?
-
-A large part of the request handling seems to be identical for UHCI and
-OHCI, so it would be a good idea to extract the common parts and have only
-the HW specific stuff in uhci.c. Furthermore, all other USB device drivers
-should need URBification, if they use isochronous or interrupt transfers.
-One thing missing in the current implementation (and the old UHCI driver)
-is fair queueing for BULK transfers. Since this would need (in principle)
-the alteration of already constructed TD chains (to switch from depth to
-breadth execution), another way has to be found. Maybe some simple
-heuristics work with the same effect.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-2. Internal structure and mechanisms
-
-To get quickly familiar with the internal structures, here's a short
-description how the new UHCI driver works. However, the ultimate source of
-truth is only uhci.c!
-
-2.1. Descriptor structure (QHs and TDs)
-
-During initialization, the following skeleton is allocated in init_skel:
-
- framespecific | common chain
-
-framelist[]
-[ 0 ]-----> TD --> TD -------\
-[ 1 ]-----> TD --> TD --------> TD ----> QH -------> QH -------> QH ---> NULL
- ... TD --> TD -------/
-[1023]-----> TD --> TD ------/
-
- ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
- 1024 TDs for 7 TDs for 1 TD for Start of Start of End Chain
- ISO INT (2-128ms) 1ms-INT CTRL Chain BULK Chain
-
-For each CTRL or BULK transfer a new QH is allocated and the containing data
-transfers are appended as (vertical) TDs. After building the whole QH with its
-dangling TDs, the QH is inserted before the BULK Chain QH (for CTRL) or
-before the End Chain QH (for BULK). Since only the QH->next pointers are
-affected, no atomic memory operation is required. The three QHs in the
-common chain are never equipped with TDs!
-
-For ISO or INT, the TD for each frame is simply inserted into the appropriate
-ISO/INT-TD-chain for the desired frame. The 7 skeleton INT-TDs are scattered
-among the 1024 frames similar to the old UHCI driver.
-
-For CTRL/BULK/ISO, the last TD in the transfer has the IOC-bit set. For INT,
-every TD (there is only one...) has the IOC-bit set.
-
-Besides the data for the UHCI controller (2 or 4 32bit words), the descriptors
-are double-linked through the .vertical and .horizontal elements in the
-SW data of the descriptor (using the double-linked list structures and
-operations), but SW-linking occurs only in closed domains, i.e. for each of
-the 1024 ISO-chains and the 8 INT-chains there is a closed cycle. This
-simplifies all insertions and unlinking operations and avoids costly
-bus_to_virt()-calls.
-
-2.2. URB structure and linking to QH/TDs
-
-During assembly of the QH and TDs of the requested action, these descriptors
-are stored in urb->urb_list, so the allocated QH/TD descriptors are bound to
-this URB.
-If the assembly was successful and the descriptors were added to the HW chain,
-the corresponding URB is inserted into a global URB list for this controller.
-This list stores all pending URBs.
-
-2.3. Interrupt processing
-
-Since UHCI provides no means to directly detect completed transactions, the
-following is done in each UHCI interrupt (uhci_interrupt()):
-
-For each URB in the pending queue (process_urb()), the ACTIVE-flag of the
-associated TDs are processed (depending on the transfer type
-process_{transfer|interrupt|iso}()). If the TDs are not active anymore,
-they indicate the completion of the transaction and the status is calculated.
-Inactive QH/TDs are removed from the HW chain (since the host controller
-already removed the TDs from the QH, no atomic access is needed) and
-eventually the URB is marked as completed (OK or errors) and removed from the
-pending queue. Then the next linked URB is submitted. After (or immediately
-before) that, the completion handler is called.
-
-2.4. Unlinking URBs
-
-First, all QH/TDs stored in the URB are unlinked from the HW chain.
-To ensure that the host controller really left a vertical TD chain, we
-wait for one frame. After that, the TDs are physically destroyed.
-
-2.5. URB linking and the consequences
-
-Since URBs can be linked and the corresponding submit_urb is called in
-the UHCI-interrupt, all work associated with URB/QH/TD assembly has to be
-interrupt save. This forces kmalloc to use GFP_ATOMIC in the interrupt.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists