[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080519064345.GB4707@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 10:43:45 +0400
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>
Cc: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ERR_PTR: warn when ERR_PTR parameter is not errno
value
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 01:13:20AM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com> writes:
>
> > Check at runtime whether error argument of ERR_PTR and ERR_OR_0_PTR
> > is valid. It can catch bugs which possibly lead to oops or panic earlier.
> >
> > Currently there are > 600 calls of ERR_PTR with non-constant argument
> > in Linux kernel sources.
> > --- a/include/linux/err.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/err.h
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/compiler.h>
> >
> > +#include <asm/bug.h>
> > #include <asm/errno.h>
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -21,6 +22,7 @@
> >
> > static inline void *__ERR_PTR(long error)
> > {
> > + WARN_ON(!IS_ERR_VALUE(error));
> > return (void *) error;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -28,6 +30,7 @@ static inline void *__ERR_PTR(long error)
> >
> > static inline void *__ERR_OR_0_PTR(long error)
> > {
> > + WARN_ON(!IS_ERR_VALUE(error) && error);
> > return (void *) error;
> > }
>
> How about WARN_ON_ONCE() instead? That would warn once for each erroneous user
> which should be enough.
And blow up .bss ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists