[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1211236048.5915.94.camel@brick>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 15:27:28 -0700
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] asm-generic/int-ll64.h: always provide __{s,u}64
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 15:01 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Several compilers offer "long long" without claiming to support C99.
> >
> > Considering how frequent __s64/__u64 are used our userspace headers are
> > anyway unusable without __s64/__u64 available.
> >
> > Always offer __s64/__u64 to non-gcc non-C99 compilers - if they provide
> > "long long" that makes the headers compiling and if they don't they are
> > anyway screwed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
>
> This makes sense to me (I did, however, not want to make that change
> part of the same changeset - one change at a time.)
>
> The main reason for not just blindly using "long long" has to do with
> the use of gcc -ansi -pedantic in userspace, which is already taken care
> of by the use of __extension__ in the __GNUC__ clause.
>
If it is going to be unconditionally offered, we could get rid of
__BYTEORDER_HAS_U64__ as a next step. Unless there is something I've
missed.
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists