[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080519223933.GA2315@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 00:39:33 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...escale.com>,
hartleys <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>,
Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.25-git] gpio: sysfs interface
On Sat 2008-05-17 15:14:06, David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 02 May 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > > > echo "export 23" > /sys/class/gpio/control
> > > > ... will gpio_request(23, "sysfs") and gpio_export(23); use
> > > > /sys/class/gpio/gpio-23/direction to configure it.
> > > > echo "unexport 23" > /sys/class/gpio/control
> > > > ... will gpio_free(23)
> > >
> > > hm, does ths sysfs one-value-per-file rule apply to writes?
> >
> > Having seen ibm acpi interface... yes, that rule should be aplied for
> > writes, too.
>
> The latest version of this patch, which I'll post soonish,
> follows the suggestion to have one file for the "export"
> operation and another for "unexport".
>
>
> > What about mkdir gpio-N to export it?
>
> Ugh. That would create way more complication than I want
> to see here. I thought about that early on, and decided
> that was Not The Way To Go.
...but it would be consistent with configfs... and face it... doing
echo > file to make a directory is seriously ugly.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists