[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080519162149.50f58b80.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 16:21:49 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwilder@...ibm.com,
prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 1/1] trace_printk and trace_dump interface - v2
On Sat, 17 May 2008 07:52:16 +0530
"K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Resending this patch due to style issues found in previous patch.
>
> This patch introduces two new interfaces called trace_printk and
> trace_dump which can be used to print to the debugfs mount directly.
> It uses the 'trace' infrastructure underneath and is a patch over it.
> A sample file is also created to demonstrate its ease of use.
>
> Signed-off-by: K.Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/trace.txt | 22 ++++
> include/linux/trace.h | 57 +++++++++++
> lib/trace.c | 205
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> samples/trace/Makefile | 2
> samples/trace/fork_new_trace.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++
The patch is wordwrapped and space-stuffed.
> ...
>
> static void remove_tree(struct trace_info *trace)
> {
> + struct list_head *pos, *temp;
> + struct trace_dir *dr = NULL;
> +
> mutex_lock(&trace_mutex);
> debugfs_remove(trace->dir);
>
> + list_for_each_safe(pos, temp, &trace_dirs) {
> + dr = list_entry(pos, struct trace_dir, trace_dir_list);
list_for_each_entry_safe()?
> + if (dr->ti == trace) {
> + list_del(pos);
> + kfree(dr);
> + }
> + }
> if (trace->root) {
> if (--trace->root->users == 0)
> remove_root(trace);
> @@ -142,11 +153,17 @@ static struct trace_root *lookup_root(co
> static struct dentry *create_tree(struct trace_info *trace, const char
> *root,
> const char *name)
> {
> - struct dentry *dir = NULL;
> + struct trace_dir *temp;
>
> if (root == NULL || name == NULL)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> + temp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct trace_dir), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if ((temp == NULL) || (strlen(name) > TRACE_NAME_SIZE))
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
This can leak `temp'.
I suspect it has an off-by-one.
You should check the incoming args before allocating any resources or
doing anything which has side-effects.
> + strlcpy(temp->trace_dir_name, name, sizeof(temp->trace_dir_name));
then use kstrdup().
Please don't call variables "temp" or "tmp". Surely something more
communcative can be thought up.
> mutex_lock(&trace_mutex);
>
> trace->root = lookup_root(root);
> @@ -155,17 +172,49 @@ static struct dentry *create_tree(struct
> goto err;
> }
>
> - dir = debugfs_create_dir(name, trace->root->root);
> - if (IS_ERR(dir))
> + temp->trace_root = trace->root->root;
> + temp->trace_dir = debugfs_create_dir(name, trace->root->root);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(temp->trace_dir))
> remove_root(trace);
> - else
> + else {
> trace->root->users++;
> + temp->ti = trace;
> + list_add_tail(&temp->trace_dir_list, &trace_dirs);
> + }
>
> err:
> mutex_unlock(&trace_mutex);
> - return dir;
> + return temp->trace_dir;
> }
>
> +int trace_exists(const char *parent_dir, const char *dir,
> + struct trace_info **ti)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos;
> + struct trace_root *r;
> + struct trace_dir *temp;
> +
> + list_for_each(pos, &trace_roots) {
> + r = list_entry(pos, struct trace_root, list);
list_for_each_entry()?
> + if (!strcmp(parent_dir, r->name))
> + goto search_dir;
> + }
> + return TRACE_PARENT_DIR_ABSENT;
> +
> + search_dir:
> + list_for_each(pos, &trace_dirs) {
> + temp = list_entry(pos, struct trace_dir, trace_dir_list);
> +
> + if (!strcmp(dir, temp->trace_dir_name)) {
> + *ti = temp->ti;
> + return TRACE_DIR_EXISTS;
> + }
> + }
> + return TRACE_PARENT_DIR_EXISTS;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_exists);
I wonder if the whole "trace_*" namespace was a good choice. There are
other trace patches in-kernel, out-of-kernel and presumably in our
future.
> static int dropped_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> {
> filp->private_data = inode->i_private;
> @@ -561,3 +610,149 @@ void trace_cleanup(struct trace_info *tr
> kfree(trace);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_cleanup);
> +
> +/**
> + * trace_cleanup_all - Removes all trace directories under a parent_dir
> + * @parent_dir: Name of the parent directory
> + */
> +void trace_cleanup_all(const char *parent_dir)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos, *pos_temp;
> + struct trace_dir *temp;
> +
> + list_for_each_safe(pos, pos_temp, &trace_dirs) {
> + temp = list_entry(pos, struct trace_dir, trace_dir_list);
list_for_each_entry_safe()?
> + if (!strncmp(parent_dir, temp->trace_root->d_iname, \
> + strlen(parent_dir)))
> + trace_cleanup(temp->ti);
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_cleanup_all);
>
> ...
>
> +static inline int init_trace_interface(struct trace_printk_data *tpk)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + tpk->exists = trace_exists(tpk->parent_dir, tpk->dir, &tpk->ti);
> +
> + switch (tpk->exists) {
> +
> + case TRACE_PARENT_DIR_EXISTS:
> + case TRACE_PARENT_DIR_ABSENT:
> + if (!tpk->buf_size)
> + tpk->buf_size = DEFAULT_TRACE_BUF_SIZE;
> + if (!tpk->sub_buf_size)
> + tpk->sub_buf_size = DEFAULT_TRACE_SUB_BUF_NR;
> + tpk->ti = trace_setup(tpk->parent_dir, tpk->dir,
> + tpk->buf_size, tpk->sub_buf_size, tpk->flags);
> + printk(KERN_INFO "Trace interface %s setup\n",
> + tpk->ti->dir->d_iname);
> + if (IS_ERR(tpk->ti)) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Error initialising %s interface\n",
> + tpk->ti->dir->d_iname);
> + return -EPERM;
> + }
> + /* Fall through */
> + case TRACE_DIR_EXISTS:
> + if (tpk->ti->state == TRACE_SETUP)
> + ret = trace_start(tpk->ti);
> + else
> + ret = -EPERM;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Two callsites, far too large to be inlined.
Please just don't use inline at all, except in exceptional
circumstances. The compiler will work it out for normal usage.
> +/**
> + * trace_printk - Output a string to debugfs mount 'directly' using
> 'trace'
> + * @tpk: Structure containing info such as parent_dir and directory
> + * @format: String containing format string specifiers
> + * @ap: List of arguments
> + */
> +int trace_printk(struct trace_printk_data *tpk, char *format, ...)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + va_list(ap);
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
So I look at this and wonder "why did that need initialising?"
> + va_start(ap, format);
> +
> + ret = init_trace_interface(tpk);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Now do the actual printing */
> + /* Take an RCU Lock over the trace_info state */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + /* Take a spinlock for the global buffer used by relay */
> + if (tpk->flags & TRACE_GLOBAL_CHANNEL)
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&tpk->ti->trace_lock, flags);
ah, because you got a compiler warning.
That's why we have "uninitialized_var()": so the reader can understand
what is happening. Plus uninitialized_var() generates no code, whereas
that assignment generates additional text.
uninitialized_var() is fairly sucky, but adding a mysterious,
seemingly-unneeded and code-generating "= 0" is suckier.
> + ret = trace_printf(tpk->ti, format, ap);
> + if (tpk->flags & TRACE_GLOBAL_CHANNEL)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tpk->ti->trace_lock, flags);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + va_end(ap);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_printk);
> +
> +/**
> + * trace_dump - Output binary into debugfs mount 'directly' using 'trace'
> + * @tpk: Structure containing info such as parent_dir and directory
> + * @output: Data that needs to be output
> + * @output_len: Length of the output data
> + */
> +int trace_dump(struct trace_printk_data *tpk, const void *output,
> + const int output_len)
> +{
> + char *record;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
there too.
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ret = init_trace_interface(tpk);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Now do the actual printing */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + /* Take a spinlock for the global buffer used by relay */
> + if (tpk->flags & TRACE_GLOBAL_CHANNEL)
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&tpk->ti->trace_lock, flags);
Making a callee's locking behaviour dependent upon an incoming argument
is considered poor style and earns nastygrams from Linus. Is there no
sane alternative?
> + record = relay_reserve(tpk->ti->rchan, output_len);
> +
> + if (record && trace_running(tpk->ti))
> + memcpy(record, output, output_len);
> + else {
> + if (record)
> + ret = -EPERM;
> + else
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + if (tpk->flags & TRACE_GLOBAL_CHANNEL)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tpk->ti->trace_lock, flags);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_dump);
>
> ...
>
> +int init_module(void)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + int len_parent_dir, len_dir;
> +
> + /* setup the kprobe */
> + kp.pre_handler = handler_pre;
> + kp.post_handler = NULL;
> + kp.fault_handler = NULL;
> + kp.symbol_name = PROBE_POINT;
> + ret = register_kprobe(&kp);
> + if (ret) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "fork_trace: register_kprobe failed\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + len_parent_dir = strlen(SAMPLE_PARENT_DIR) + 1;
> + /* Initialising len_dir to the larger of the two dir names */
> + len_dir = strlen("kprobe_struct") + 1;
> +
> + tpk = kzalloc(sizeof(*tpk), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tpk)
> + ret = 1;
> +
> + tpk->parent_dir = SAMPLE_PARENT_DIR;
> +
> + /* Let's do a binary dump of struct kprobe using trace_dump */
> + tpk->dir = "kprobes_struct";
> + tpk->flags = TRACE_GLOBAL_CHANNEL;
> + trace_dump(tpk, &kp, sizeof(kp));
> +
> + /* Now change the directory to collect fork pid data */
> + tpk->dir = PROBE_POINT;
> +
> + if (ret)
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to find required free memory. "
> + "Trace new sample module loading aborted");
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +void cleanup_module(void)
> +{
> + unregister_kprobe(&kp);
> +
> + /* Just a single cleanup call passing the parent dir string */
> + trace_cleanup_all(SAMPLE_PARENT_DIR);
> +}
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Do init_module() and cleanup_module() actually get called? We _used_
to have magic code which automatically calls those functions but I'd
have thought it got removed years ago?
Anyway, we should be using module_init() and module_exit() here, and
those functions should have static scope.
> Index: linux-blktrace-many/samples/trace/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-blktrace-many.orig/samples/trace/Makefile
> +++ linux-blktrace-many/samples/trace/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> # builds the trace example kernel modules;
> # then to use (as root): insmod <fork_trace.ko>
>
> -obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_TRACE) := fork_trace.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_TRACE) := fork_trace.o fork_new_trace.o
> Index: linux-blktrace-many/Documentation/trace.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-blktrace-many.orig/Documentation/trace.txt
> +++ linux-blktrace-many/Documentation/trace.txt
> @@ -150,6 +150,28 @@ The steps a kernel data provider takes t
> 5) Destroy the trace channel and underlying relay channel -
> trace_cleanup().
>
> +Alternatively the user may choose to make use of two new interfaces --
> +trace_printk() and trace_dump() -- to setup trace interface and
> +trace_cleanup_all() to tear-down the same.
> +
> +Steps to use:
> +1) Create and populate an instance of trace_printk_data structure. The
> fields
> + parent_dir and dir are mandatory. The fields buf_size, sub_buf_size
> and flags
> + are optional and will take default values if not populated. The field
> + 'exists' and ti are for the trace infrastructure to use. The pointer
> to the
> + 'struct trace_info' i.e. ti may be used to perform fine granular
> operations
> + such as determine the state of the 'trace', stop individual traces,
> etc.
> +2) Default values for buf_size and sub_buf_size are 4096, 40 respectively.
> +3) Use trace_dump() to output binary data which may be acted upon by a
> + high-level program (say dumping a structure). trace_printk() can be
> used
> + for string output. Pass a pointer to the instance of trace_printk_data
> + structure to these functions along with other parameters. The output
> from
> + these functions can be found at
> + <debugfs_mount>/<parent_dir>/<dir>/trace<0..n>.
> +4) trace_cleanup_all() for a given parent directory will cleanup and
> remove all
> + trace directories created under the specified directory.
> +5) Sample code for the same can be found in samples/trace/fork_new_trace.c
wordwrapping...
I often fix it, but I think we need v3 on this one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists