linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #10638] sysbench+mysql(oltp, readonly) 30% regression with 2.6.26-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 May 2008 09:10:05 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [Bug #10638] sysbench+mysql(oltp, readonly) 30% regression
	with 2.6.26-rc1

On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 14:49 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:

> I tested it on 8-core stoakley.
> 
> 1) volanoMark
> Comparing with 2.6.26-rc1, 2.6.26-rc3+peter_sched_git_patch result has about 30% improvement, but it still has
> about 27% regression than the one of 2.6.25.
> 
> 2) sysbench+mysql(readonly oltp)
> Comparing with 2.6.26-rc2, 2.6.26-rc3+peter_sched_git_patch result has about 15% improvement, but it still has
> about 15% regression than the one of 2.6.25.

Hmm, so both about halfways. When testing on a quad vmark got all the
way back but sysbench was indeed half way.

Ah, well. I'll just continue poking at this. Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/