[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080520100815.3010688b@core>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:08:15 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown
On Tue, 20 May 2008 02:20:56 -0400
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 01:14:23AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The Big Kernel Lock has been pushed down from chardev_open
> > to misc_open, this change moves it to the individual watchdog
> > driver open functions.
> >
> > As before, the change was purely mechanical, most drivers
> > should actually not need the BKL.
>
> Actually I'd prefer to fix this for real. This single open stuff aswell
> as same set of ioctls are duplicated all over the watchdog drivers. We'd
> be much better off introducing a simple watchdog layer that handles this
> plus proper locking and convert drivers over to it gradually.
In progress in two ways
- Wim was (is ?) working on a proper device layer
- I've cleaned up all the drivers and am now testing a watchdog
driver supporting library which is taking about 50% of the code out of
each driver I convert.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists