linux-kernel - [PATCH] x86: add save_stack_trace_bp() for tracing from a specific stack frame

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080520092803.GA6893@damson.getinternet.no>
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2008 11:28:03 +0200
From:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86: add save_stack_trace_bp() for tracing from a specific
	stack frame

Hi Ingo,

I'll put this at the front of the kmemcheck queue. Looks ok?

Vegard


>From 03c790cd13efc34c26b9866db46e501dc645faf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 11:15:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86: add save_stack_trace_bp() for tracing from a specific stack frame

This will help kmemcheck (and possibly other debugging tools) since we
can now simply pass regs->bp to the stack tracer instead of specifying
the number of stack frames to skip, which is unreliable if gcc decides
to inline functions, etc.

Note that this makes the API incomplete for other architectures, but I
expect that those can be updated lazily, e.g. when they need it.

Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c |    7 +++++++
 include/linux/stacktrace.h   |    1 +
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
index c28c342..97202ad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -75,6 +75,13 @@ void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
 		trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
 }
 
+void save_stack_trace_bp(struct stack_trace *trace, unsigned long bp)
+{
+	dump_trace(current, NULL, NULL, bp, &save_stack_ops, trace);
+	if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
+		trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
+}
+
 void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
 {
 	dump_trace(tsk, NULL, NULL, 0, &save_stack_ops_nosched, trace);
diff --git a/include/linux/stacktrace.h b/include/linux/stacktrace.h
index 5da9794..2a3cbe8 100644
--- a/include/linux/stacktrace.h
+++ b/include/linux/stacktrace.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ struct stack_trace {
 };
 
 extern void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace);
+extern void save_stack_trace_bp(struct stack_trace *trace, unsigned long bp);
 extern void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk,
 				struct stack_trace *trace);
 
-- 
1.5.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/