[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200805201208.47986.IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 12:08:47 +0200
From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] rfkill: add read-write rfkill switch support
On Sunday 18 May 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Currently, rfkill support for read/write rfkill switches is hacked through
> a round-trip over the input layer and rfkill-input to let a driver sync
> rfkill->state to hardware changes.
>
> This is buggy and sub-optimal. It causes real problems. It is best to
> think of the rfkill class as supporting only write-only switches at the
> moment.
>
> In order to implement the read/write functionality properly:
>
> Add a get_state() hook that is called by the class every time it needs to
> fetch the current state of the switch. Add a call to this hook every time
> the *current* state of the radio plays a role in a decision.
>
> Also add a force_state() method that can be used to forcefully syncronize
> the class' idea of the current state of the switch. This allows for a
> faster implementation of the read/write functionality, as a driver which
> get events on switch changes can avoid the need for a get_state() hook.
>
> If the get_state() hook is left as NULL, current behaviour is maintained,
> so this change is fully backwards compatible with the current rfkill
> drivers.
>
> For hardware that issues events when the rfkill state changes, leave
> get_state() NULL in the rfkill struct, set the initial state properly
> before registering with the rfkill class, and use the force_state() method
> in the driver to keep the rfkill interface up-to-date.
>
> get_state() can be called by the class from atomic context. It must not
> sleep.
>
> Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@...il.com>
> Cc: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@...il.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>
> ---
> include/linux/rfkill.h | 5 ++++
> net/rfkill/rfkill.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rfkill.h b/include/linux/rfkill.h
> index ca89ae1..844e961 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rfkill.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rfkill.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ enum rfkill_state {
> * @data: Pointer to the RF button drivers private data which will be
> * passed along when toggling radio state.
> * @toggle_radio(): Mandatory handler to control state of the radio.
> + * @get_state(): handler to read current radio state from hardware,
> + * may be called from atomic context, should return 0 on success.
> * @led_trigger: A LED trigger for this button's LED.
> * @dev: Device structure integrating the switch into device tree.
> * @node: Used to place switch into list of all switches known to the
> @@ -80,6 +82,7 @@ struct rfkill {
>
> void *data;
> int (*toggle_radio)(void *data, enum rfkill_state state);
> + int (*get_state)(void *data, enum rfkill_state *state);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RFKILL_LEDS
> struct led_trigger led_trigger;
> @@ -95,6 +98,8 @@ void rfkill_free(struct rfkill *rfkill);
> int rfkill_register(struct rfkill *rfkill);
> void rfkill_unregister(struct rfkill *rfkill);
>
> +int rfkill_force_state(struct rfkill *rfkill, enum rfkill_state state);
> +
> /**
> * rfkill_get_led_name - Get the LED trigger name for the button's LED.
> * This function might return a NULL pointer if registering of the
> diff --git a/net/rfkill/rfkill.c b/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
> index 3edc585..2e19b68 100644
> --- a/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
> +++ b/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
> @@ -62,19 +62,39 @@ static void rfkill_led_trigger(struct rfkill *rfkill,
> #endif /* CONFIG_RFKILL_LEDS */
> }
>
> +static void update_rfkill_state(struct rfkill *rfkill)
> +{
> + enum rfkill_state newstate;
> +
> + if (rfkill->get_state) {
> + mutex_lock(&rfkill->mutex);
> + if (!rfkill->get_state(rfkill->data, &newstate))
> + rfkill->state = newstate;
> + mutex_unlock(&rfkill->mutex);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int rfkill_toggle_radio(struct rfkill *rfkill,
> enum rfkill_state state)
> {
> int retval = 0;
> + enum rfkill_state oldstate, newstate;
> +
> + oldstate = rfkill->state;
> +
> + if (rfkill->get_state &&
> + !rfkill->get_state(rfkill->data, &newstate))
> + rfkill->state = newstate;
>
> if (state != rfkill->state) {
> retval = rfkill->toggle_radio(rfkill->data, state);
> - if (!retval) {
> + if (!retval)
> rfkill->state = state;
> - rfkill_led_trigger(rfkill, state);
> - }
> }
>
> + if (rfkill->state != oldstate)
> + rfkill_led_trigger(rfkill, rfkill->state);
> +
> return retval;
> }
>
> @@ -105,6 +125,28 @@ void rfkill_switch_all(enum rfkill_type type, enum rfkill_state state)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rfkill_switch_all);
>
> +/**
> + * rfkill_force_state - Force the internal rfkill radio state
> + * @rfkill: pointer to the rfkill class to modify.
> + * @state: the current radio state the class should be forced to.
> + *
> + * This function updates the internal state of the radio cached
> + * by the rfkill class. It should be used when the driver gets
> + * a notification by the firmware/hardware of the current *real*
> + * state of the radio rfkill switch.
> + *
> + * It may not be called from an atomic context.
> + */
> +int rfkill_force_state(struct rfkill *rfkill, enum rfkill_state state)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&rfkill->mutex);
> + rfkill->state = state;
> + mutex_unlock(&rfkill->mutex);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rfkill_force_state);
> +
> static ssize_t rfkill_name_show(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> @@ -147,6 +189,7 @@ static ssize_t rfkill_state_show(struct device *dev,
> {
> struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev);
>
> + update_rfkill_state(rfkill);
> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", rfkill->state);
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists