linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/15] rfkill: document rw rfkill switches and clarify input subsystem interactions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 May 2008 12:09:08 +0200
From:	Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>
To:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] rfkill: document rw rfkill switches and clarify input subsystem interactions

> +You should:
>  	- rfkill_allocate()
> -	- input_allocate_polled_device()
> +	- modify rfkill fields (flags, name)
> +	- modify state to the current hardware state (THIS IS THE ONLY TIME
> +	  YOU CAN ACCESS state DIRECTLY)
>  	- rfkill_register()
> -	- input_register_polled_device()

Wasn't it the plan to send the current hardware state as rfkill registration argument,
so we can force drivers to send a valid state to rfkill?

Ivo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/