[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080520091732.GB101@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 13:17:32 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signals: fix sigqueue_free() vs __exit_signal() race
On 05/19, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 May 2008 19:14:18 +0400 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru> wrote:
>
> > __exit_signal() does flush_sigqueue(tsk->pending) outside of ->siglock.
> > This can race with another thread doing sigqueue_free(), we can free
> > the same SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC sigqueue twice or corrupt the pending->list.
> >
> > Note that even sys_exit_group() can trigger this race, not only
> > sys_timer_delete().
> >
> > Move the callsite of flush_sigqueue(tsk->pending) under ->siglock.
> >
> > This patch doesn't touch flush_sigqueue(->shared_pending) below, it is
> > called when there are no other threads which can play with signals,
> > and sigqueue_free() can't be used outside of our thread group.
>
> afacit this is the only needed-in-2.6.26 patch from these two
> three-patch series, yes?
Yes, other patches are not bugfixes.
Probably this fix is not "urgent" too, the race is very old and nobody
complained.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists