linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] (RESEND) ext3[34] barrier changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200805200804.49389.chris.mason@oracle.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2008 08:04:48 -0400
From:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To:	Timothy Shimmin <tes@....com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] (RESEND) ext3[34] barrier changes

On Monday 19 May 2008, Timothy Shimmin wrote:

[ power fail testing with write back cache on ]

> > I was also able to trigger corruptions on XFS (one run out of two), so it
> > is unlikely I'm seeing bugs in the ext3 replay or logging code.
>
> Just to clarify,
> was this test with barriers on or off for XFS?
> I'm wondering if it was with barriers on, then we have a reproducible
> bug in log replay.
> Or whether you were just confirming the problems with barriers off on
> another filesystem.

Barriers were off on xfs, the corruptions were not xfs' fault.

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/