[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b9198260805200659p6ed28403t9b0b0ea995f158d5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 14:59:14 +0100
From: "Tom Spink" <tspink@...il.com>
To: "Jeff Dike" <jdike@...toit.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: UML fails to locate address space
2008/5/20 Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:08:24PM +0100, Tom Spink wrote:
>> I've just recently pulled the latest GIT and compiled UML, however,
>> when I run it a message appears saying "Locating the top of the
>> address space... Address 0x0 no good?" and the program exits.
>
> Can you strace it and send me the output?
Attached. I guess the line of interest is:
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = -1 EACCES (Permission
denied)
>
>> After some digging, it appears that page_ok is returning false when
>> checking 'bottom', in os_get_task_size
>> (arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/task_size.c:96). After running through
>> GDB, it seems that in line 31 of that file is where the segfault
>> occurs:
>>
>> n = *address;
>>
>> i.e. when trying to read from the address space (at address zero).
>
> The segfaults are on purpose - it will trap SIGSEGV and longjmp out of
> the handler and mark the affected address as not-usable.
I gathered that much - I was just letting you know which test it was
that was failing.
>
> Jeff
>
Thanks!
--
Tom Spink
Download attachment "uml-strace" of type "application/octet-stream" (2978 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists