lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a8748490805191701h75e85bccw6e8aa4b452cde19c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2008 02:01:30 +0200
From:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To:	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26

2008/5/19 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>:
>
>
> On Mon, 19 May 2008, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>>
>> Ok, thanks a lot.  Now, I have one final question for you.
>> In order to be able to play around with the patches, see if they
>> apply, fix them up, test for merge conflicts etc etc, I obviously need
>> a tree with content, not just a bare tree. But I see on
>> master.kernel.org that all the published trees are bare trees.
>
> I think just about *everybody* does their own development on their own
> machine. I know I do, and I'm pretty certain that everybody else does too.
> Then we just upload the end result to master.kernel.org into a bare
> repository that is only used for exporting to others, never for anything
> else.
>
>> So, I assume I create a tree in my homedir like so;
>>   $ git clone -l -s /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git /home/juhl/trivial-work-tree
>> create all the branches and do all the work in that one,
>
> You can do that, and actually work on master.kernel.org, but do you really
> want to?
>
Not if I can help it, no. I just couldn't work out from the git docs
how to do it otherwise when working with kernel.org and bare trees.

<snip>
> Then, the easiest way to publish the result is to just create a bare
> repository on master.kernel.org, and push to it. And just make sure that
> you pre-populate that bare repo with my tree, so that when you push from
> your home machine, it only pushes the (smallish) actual changes!
>
> So the workflow I'd suggest is:
>
>  - do all the work on your own hardware
>
>  - create the initial (bare) kernel.org tree with
>
>        cd /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/juhl
>        git clone --bare -l -s ../torvalds/linux-2.6 trivial-2.6
>
>  - then just push to that tree from your own machine
>
> and voila, you're all done.
>
<snip>

That worked beautifully. Thanks a lot.


Stephen: There is now a trivial-2.6.git tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/juhl/trivial-2.6.git
with a 'next' branch that you can pull into linux-next, please.

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/juhl/trivial-2.6.git next

Once we hit a merge window I'll rename the 'next' branch and ask Linus
to pull it, then create a new 'next'.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ