[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805200752580.32253@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 07:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> Like this ? (I don't have a -mm handy, so guessed based on mm-commits mail,
> patch uncompiled, but should dtrt if I understood your diff correctly)
>
> diff --git a/lib/list_debug.c b/lib/list_debug.c
> index 4350ba9..d8dee53 100644
> --- a/lib/list_debug.c
> +++ b/lib/list_debug.c
> @@ -21,16 +21,14 @@ void __list_add(struct list_head *new,
> struct list_head *next)
> {
> if (unlikely(next->prev != prev)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
> + WARN(1, "list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
> "prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
> prev, next->prev, next);
> - BUG();
> }
I think Arjan meant like
WARN(next->prev != prev,
"list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
"prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
prev, next->prev, next);
without any "if()" statement at all.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists