[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4832E61A.3080009@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 07:54:18 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
CC: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] asm-generic/int-ll64.h: always provide __{s,u}64
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> $ cat test.c
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> int main()
> {
> #ifdef __i486__
> printf("foobarbaz\n");
> #endif
>
> return 0;
> }
*Groan* you're right. Blitering idiots... they only present __i386__
and whatever *exact* CPU you have -march= for, which of course is a
*CHANGING SET* (just __i486__, __i586__ and __i686__ isn't enough...
they seem to also have __core2__, __k8__ and $DEITY knows what else.)
The only sensible way to handle that would be to centralize that
knowledge in a header file.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists