[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080520152227.GC542@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 11:22:27 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 08:12:41AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So no, lists aren't "special" in any inherent way, they are just special
> in these kinds of "incidentally, a lot of random data structure corruption
> has traditionally shown up in lists, because there are so many of them".
It's also been _really_ useful for showing up random bit flips in bad hardware.
"hey, if that bit had been a 1, this pointer would have looked valid and we
wouldn't have oopsed" has led to quite a few cases where the reporter then
found a session with memtest86 enlightening.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists