[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b9198260805200943x6fb15512o7ba35a40d006b215@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 17:43:17 +0100
From: "Tom Spink" <tspink@...il.com>
To: "Jeff Dike" <jdike@...toit.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: UML fails to locate address space
2008/5/20 Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:59:14PM +0100, Tom Spink wrote:
>> Attached. I guess the line of interest is:
>>
>> mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
>> MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = -1 EACCES (Permission
>> denied)
>
> Yup.
>
> Can you try three things:
> check the maps file for any arbitrary process
> (i.e. /proc/$$/maps) and see if there's anything mapped at 0
Nothing.
> gdb UML, stop it at that mmap, check its maps file and see if
> there's anything mapped at 0
Nope.
> send me a pointer to the patches that Ubuntu has applied on
> top of the stock kernel - I'm suspicious that they special-cased page
> zero in order to ensure that NULL pointer dereferences cause faults.
>
> You can test this last theory by initializing bottom to 4096 instead
> of 0.
I suspected this type of foul-play, and tried altering bottom to 1,
but this didn't work. So, I took out the page_ok test, and it
continued booting. So I went back, put the test back in and
incremented bottom until I got to 16. It worked at 16. :-)
Is this something that can be fixed, or would a config option be appropriate?
I am willing to blame Ubuntu, but unfortunately, I can't find an
online resource of their patches.
> Jeff
>
> --
> Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
>
--
Tom Spink
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists