linux-kernel - Re: [Q] eCryptFS race window?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080520183908.GB9623@cvg>
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2008 22:39:08 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...ibm.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Q] eCryptFS race window?

[Michael Halcrow - Tue, May 20, 2008 at 01:27:57PM -0500]
| On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:03:21PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > it seems there is a few potential race window in eCryptFS which I
| > was trying to fix but it requires more deeper eCrypFS knowledge that
| > have (at least only by understanding eCryptFS in big picture it is
| > possible to fix this problem by elegant path). So what is the
| > problem - the procedures
| > 
| > 	ecryptfs_miscdev_poll
| > 	ecryptfs_miscdev_read
| > 
| > does take ecryptfs_daemon_hash_mux mutex and then daemon->mux _but_
| > releases them not in exactly backward order as it should. My patches
| > (not in mainline but you saw them) was screwed up 'cause
| > mutex_is_locked could release mutex acquired by another process and
| > that is wrong. But I've a hope that I'm simply *wrong* about this
| > possible races ;) Take a look please.
| 
| I cannot find an execution path whereby one of the two must re-acquire
| ecryptfs_daemon_hash_mux in order to release daemon->mux, so I do not
| think we will ever have deadlock between those two functions.
| 
| Mike
| 

ok, that means I'm just wrong, thanks

		- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/