[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1211309022.7496.3.camel@iris.sw.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 22:43:42 +0400
From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@...nvz.org>
To: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Robert Olsson <robert.olsson@....uu.se>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] pktgen: make sure that pktgen_thread_worker has
been executed
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 20:30 +0200, Robert Olsson wrote:
> Denis V. Lunev writes:
>
> > The problem is that pktgen_thread_worker can not be executed if kthread_stop
> > has been called too early. Insert a completion on the normal initialization
> > path to make sure that pktgen_thread_worker will gain the control for sure.
>
>
> Yes how about if we move the wait_for_completion() to pg_cleanup before
> we remove the threads. And move the complete() last in pktgen_thread_worker.
> This completion would sync with both start and stop.
>
> Cheers.
> --ro
you can't. The idea is to have a checkpoint _before_ khread_stop.
Currently you have a race between
static int kthread(void *_create)
{
...
if (!kthread_should_stop())
pktgen_thread_worker();
...
}
and kthread_stop. If kthread_stop will be called _before_ the control
goes inside pktgen_thread_worker you'll OOPS.
Regards,
Den
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists