[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080520195157.50384ac9@core>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 19:51:57 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] char dev BKL pushdown
> Right, unless Alan or Wim are confident enough that removing the
> BKL won't break the drivers (more than they are today).
> Almost all of the open functions go along the lines of
>
> int open(struct file *f, struct inode *i)
> {
> if (wd_is_open)
> return -EBUSY;
> wd_is_open = 1;
>
> start_wd();
>
> return nonseekable_open(f, i);
> }
>
> nonseekable_open doesn't need the BKL by itself, and the wd_is_open
> variable is protected by the misc_mtx mutex.
> I can't see any scenario in which start_wd() would need the BKL, or
You need to review the use of misc_register(). Which is what I did
already and sorted out for each watchdog - the job is done and completed
and the various problem cases fixed. Watchdog has already been made BKL
removal safe in the patch series I sent.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists