linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Remove all users of cpu_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080520.141607.147404741.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2008 14:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	harvey.harrison@...il.com
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Remove all users of cpu_to_{le|be}{16|32|64}p

From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 12:24:08 -0700

> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
> ---
> akpm: applies on top of the 21-patch aligned get/put helpers series.

Can you provide some contextual information in the changelog
message?

Why are the cpu_to_*p() uses going away?  Do the normal cpu_to_*() now
transparently emit the special other-endian loads and stores some
cpus?

You should always describe such things in your changelog message so
people don't need to ask these kinds of questions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/