linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] byteorder: eliminate pointer bytorder api

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080520.151951.239145609.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2008 15:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	harvey.harrison@...il.com
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] byteorder: eliminate pointer bytorder api

From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 15:15:25 -0700

> Obviously I missed that part, my apologies.  Would it be acceptable if,
> taking the possibly arch-specific parts, moved the [endian]_to_cpup
> name over to get_[endian]

Why are we fiddling with interface names that have been fine for about
10 years?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/