[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48336039.3010308@firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 01:35:21 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: corbet@....net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2/11] Add unlocked_fasync
> My concern is that the new API as long lived is ugly and not the right
> thing. I assume Linus and others have similar concerns, and weigh that
> over the "some obscure out of tree driver might break".
What do you find ugly exactly? The prefix "unlocked_" ? Other than
that there is no difference.
Duplicated entry points are not great, but they will be going away.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists