[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080520213654.a25d286e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 21:36:54 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wim@...ana.be, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/57] iTCO: unlocked_ioctl, coding style and cleanup
On Wed, 21 May 2008 14:26:15 +1000 Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> > decent-sized smashup during the merge window. There are lessons
> > here...
>
> I've been pulling out s/down_trylock/down_nowait/ patches which effect others'
> changes. Those patches get moved to the end of my queue, and I'll revisit
> them before an actual merge with Linus.
>
> As down_trylock still works (but marked deprecated) with my patches, they're
> fine to drop. Just tell me which ones...
Well, a simple patch which does
/*
* comment goes here
*/
static inline int __must_check down_nowait(struct semaphore *sem)
{
return !down_trylock(sem);
}
and which does not deprecate down_trylock() could go into mainline
right now, (assuming that the overall concept doesn't get shot down in
review - did it get reviewed?)
Then you can start trickling stuff out to people straight away.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists