linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4833CD18.9030402@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 May 2008 09:19:52 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To:	Jianjun Kong <kongjianjun@...il.com>
CC:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments

On 05/21/2008 07:58 AM, Jianjun Kong wrote:
> Standard indentation of arguments.
> I use right blank space to displace the last table, in order to make the arguments alining. For example:
> 
> old:
> extern void test_fun(struct list_head *new,
> 			struct list_head *prev,
> 			struct list_head *next);
> new:
> extern void test_fun(struct list_head *new,
> 		     struct list_head *prev,
> 		     struct list_head *next);

I think, there is no "standard" on this. I personally do prefer indentation by tabs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/